Federal Reserve Bank

Washington, D.C.

 
 

 
 

THE NEW ERA AND LIKELY FED POLICY

 
 

The paradigm of the New Era suggests that high economic growth is possible without increasing inflation. Factors generally cited include globalization, increased productivity, and technological change. In this study we suggest that a rapid disinflation in the CPI for manufactured goods has caused decreased growth in the overall Consumer Price Index since 1991. This CPI also explains inflation in the U.S. since 1979. We comment upon a paper by David Brauer of the  New York Fed and also upon the likely effect of the currency crisis in Southeast Asia.

Inflation is a phenomenon abetted by inappropriate monetary policies. Econometric analysis tracing its distinct causes, however, has not been explanatory due to the leads and lags involved.

David Brauer of the New York Fed has just published a paper titled “Do Rising Labor Costs Trigger Higher Inflation?” Brauer examined the hypothesis that wage increases cause price increases, a crucial link in the Phillips curve concept. He classified the components of the Consumer Price Index into three broad categories: labor-cost sensitive services, labor-cost sensitive goods, and other expenditure categories.

Using data between 1983-1997, he found that the linkage between wages and prices has been slightly positive in the service sector of the economy (22.8% of the total CPI), non existent in the manufacturing sector (19.4% of the total CPI), and irrelevant in other sectors (57.7% of the total CPI). The total effect of a 1% increase in wages in the service sector is only .2% on the overall CPI after more than nine months. Price increases are likely to be the most important proximate causes of inflation.

This analysis suggests a method of determining what causes change in the overall Consumer Price Index. If we assume that the manufacturing CPI from the Brauer study and oil prices are the independent variables, the resulting regression explains 90% of all inflation in the United States during the years 1979-97 (9 mo.):

 
      Consumer Price             
        Inflation    = 1.21 * Chng Mfr. CPI + .04 * Chng Oil Prices + .97
      
      Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor
               Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review 
  

The manufacturing CPI is statistically significant at the 0% level. Oil prices are significant at the .1% level. Change in the manufacturing CPI predicts 85% of all inflation, although it accounts for only 19.4% of total consumer expenditures.

A 1% change in the manufacturing CPI can be expected to cause a 1.2% change in the total CPI. Inflation is caused more by excess demand than by costs.

If we examine trends in this manufacturing CPI from the Brauer study, we can see that it decreased during the years 1984-1986 and during the years 1991-1997.

The reasons for pricing restraint were different during each period:

1984-1986

This CPI decreased because Paul Volker applied severe restraint to the economy, raising the Fed Discount Rate to an average premium of 4.3% over the rate of inflation. This premium should be compared with a thirty-seven year average premium of 1.7%.

1991-1997

Since the real Fed Discount Rate during this period has been low, another explanation for this present period of low inflation is warranted. The causes of recent decreases in the CPI for labor-cost sensitive manufactured goods are largely supply side.

In an article in Foreign Affairs (1997) titled "The End of the Business Cycle?" Steven Weber sums up the New Era arguments:

  
           "...modern economies operate differently than 
            nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century
            industrial economies. Changes in technology
            ideology, employment, and finance, along with the  
            globalization of production and consumption, have 
            reduced the volatility of economic activity in the
            industrialized world."  
 

The current combination of low inflation and high overall labor force utilization is due mainly to an excess supply of world-wide manufacturing capacity which has increased domestic competition.

We have identified the major components of inflation. We now investigate each in the order of effect. The purpose of this is to suggest a possibly useful method of reasoning from the salient facts:

1) Manufactured Tradable Goods. Changes in this CPI component have a substantial effect upon total inflation. During the time period studied, the Brauer article found no statistical link between wages and this CPI component. This is the reason that the Phillips curve has disappeared for this business cycle.

The crisis in Southeast Asia has already resulted in 10-30% currency devaluations in relation to the U.S. dollar in the eleven months since January, 1997. Many analysts expect a .5% decrease in U.S. economic growth next year due to this crisis. We think the major effect of this crisis will be upon prices. In 1996, Asia including Japan accounted for $213 billion in imports, more than 9% of the U.S.'s total manufacturing GDP. Since many imported products such as automobiles, chemicals, and apparel compete directly with U.S. manufactures, the ability of all producers to raise prices is likely to remain low. This sector is therefore unlikely to be a source of inflation in the near future.

2) Oil Prices. Political problems in the Mideast can always affect oil prices. Due to technological progress, however, there is no fundamental reason why these prices should increase appreciably. Since 1980, the world's proven reserves have increased by 60% (Energy Information Administration).

3) Service Sector Wages and Other Causes. The Brauer study has shown that a 1% change in wages in the service component of the CPI has only a .2% effect after more than nine months on the general CPI.

At this 11/97 writing, the near term outlook for inflation in the U.S. is moderate because growth in the manufactured goods CPI has been nil. Since there is some bias towards inflation in the service sector, the Fed might increase interest rates slightly over the intermediate term. As the markets continue to reverberate after October 27th, we do not think that the extremes of optimism or pessimism are justified. This is why there are institutions.

 
  

RETURN TO CONTENTS PAGE

RETURN TO HOME PAGE